| QUOTE (Wrighty @ November 02, 2009 06:54 pm) | ||||
who's scouse? |
| QUOTE (RareColour @ November 02, 2009 02:55 pm) |
| . It seems to me that New Labour have done nothing to shed us from our feudal culture. Our leaders treat us with the contempt that they consider that we deserve for being foolish enough to vote them in. They are a pathetic bunch - anyone watching their miserable performance on the Griffin QT must agree (there are clear and obvious reasons BLEUR BLAGHA BGALRHUIXFNH |
| QUOTE (Dayo Adewuyi @ November 02, 2009 01:37 pm) |
| Why appoint a body of scientists' to undertake research on drugs and then sack the head of the committee because you disagree with his findings?!?! |
| QUOTE (RareColour @ November 02, 2009 02:55 pm) |
| However, it seems to me that New Labour consider that their purpose is to 'lead' us (like children) rather than to represent us. They took us to Iraq when most of us did not want to go, citing spurious evidence. And here, again, they are deliberately clouding an already complex issue simply in order to gain a few votes here and there from a frightened public. Yet with our own money, reinvested back into the banks, they are unable to represent us adequately, allowing bankers to take enormous bonuses. |
| QUOTE |
| It's very interesting to see how these two spheres (the scientific and the political) are overlapping and causing conflict. The argument that Nutt has overstepped the mark and poked his dirty little fingers into the political pie is very weak, and defeats the fundamental point of appointing scientific advisers in the first place. Not only that, but it makes the government look shady and inadequate |
| QUOTE |
| The government are always banging on about "evidence based policy", well when confronted with evidence they dont want to hear... |
| QUOTE |
| it must be hard being a liverpool supporter right now |
| QUOTE |
| perhaps you could elaborate more about this bit which seems to me a bit pretentious and bull shitty |
| QUOTE (kwame @ November 03, 2009 01:35 pm) |
| ps. Dayo i told you Rachel was shite, but in saying that that young lad is even worse. |
| QUOTE |
| had the 'forgetting myself' experience @ wembley circa charity sheild 95/96 season. sat in the rovers end with two mates. one a rovers fan another a spurs fan. vinny samways scores possibly the jammiest wembley winner ever and i get up celebrating. looked round and soon sat back down |
| QUOTE (kwame @ November 03, 2009 01:35 pm) |
| had the 'forgetting myself' experience @ wembley circa charity sheild 95/96 season. sat in the rovers end with two mates. one a rovers fan another a spurs fan. vinny samways scores possibly the jammiest wembley winner ever and i get up celebrating. looked round and soon sat back down. |
| QUOTE (RareColour @ November 03, 2009 01:30 pm) | ||
ok maybe I got a bit carried away. > It seems to me that New Labour have done nothing to shed us from our feudal culture. I had this article in mind. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8160052.stm > Our leaders treat us with the contempt that they consider that we deserve for being foolish enough to vote them in. OTT I admit but the point is that they consistently treat the british people like fools - half baked evidence and spin are daily bread (Brown asked Nutt to provide evidence to support his policy). I don't like it. >there are clear and obvious reasons blah blah blah tribalism undermines democracy - this was actually Enoch Powell's argument many years ago for why India etc couldn't support democracy. Ironically, it may be the UK that should take more notice of this advice at this minute. I think that the reason Straw made such a mess of dealing with Griffin - who let's face it is a crank - is because his own party see their job as to lead rather than represent. They have spread confusion in the media about a number of issues in order to provide dubious support for dubious policy. I am not saying that new labour are fascist, I am saying that they have fascist like properties, which weakens their ability to deal properly with fascist parties. This may be pretentious and bull shit but I don't really care all that much. Labour made and are still making a lot of basic errors which are allowing the BNP a window into UK politics. If the Nazi's had their way all those years ago I wouldn't be alive now so perhaps the prentention comes from attempting to squeeze my rage into something coherent. I'd be interested to hear your views if you think I'm wrong. |
| QUOTE (dooby @ November 02, 2009 08:30 pm) | ||||
There seems to be some belief that Liverpool should be winning the league. Why? What gives Liverpool the right to the league? Yeah it's been ages since they did, but it will take as long as it takes. This is not Championship Manager, you can't just snap your fingers and win the league - it is a very fucking hard thing to do, and last season, in a very competitve league Liverpool nearly did it (with 86 points), and finished ahead of a team managed by a genius (Arsenal) and a team with a squad rammed full of £20m+ players (Chelsea). And yes, if it wasn't for a few errors by Benitez, then Liverpool might have won it. But focusing on Benitez's errors last season ignores everything he got right - which wasn't far from everything. How do Liverpool, without the financial clout of United and Chelsea, win the league? They have to have very strong foundations, like United have, and it takes time. After Fergie's fourth season in charge of United, they finished 13th. In his fifth season, they finished 6th. In his sixth season? 2nd. Only in his seventh season did Fergie win the title (with only 84 points from 42 games!) Would he have survived today to see that seventh season with that record, in a world of rampant sensationalist tabloid 'comment' and inane radio phone-ins. No. So will making a change bring Liverpool a league title any quicker? No, it will take much longer, and would involve bringing in the right man, which there is no guarantee of. In my opinion, the best chance Liverpool have of winning a league title is to see Rafa's long-term project through. Yes he has made mistakes, and his team is currently paying for the Alonso/Barry debacle, but he has proven time after time that he has top-class tactical acumen and motivational skills, his teams can compete against anyone in the world, and he can learn from his mistakes (he rotates no more than anyone else now). As it stands, he is the best man for the job. On Wednesday Liverpool will go to Lyon and with an injury-stricken team I believe will get a draw that will keep their hopes of CL qualification alive. If United get anything from their game with Chelsea on Sunday, then Liverpool will know that winning at home to Birmingham on Monday will bring them 7 points behind the leaders - a defecit that is not unassailable at this stage of the season. No Liverpool fan is happy with the current situation, but the season is not won or lost in November and all this reactionary bullshit is tiresome - just wait till the end of the season and then judge. |
| QUOTE (Picko-d- @ November 03, 2009 01:53 pm) |
| he has won 2 trophies in 5 seasons both cups , both on penalties |
| QUOTE (nikey @ November 03, 2009 01:52 pm) |
| we'll all believe it and end up with a cunts' government led by a cunt. for the cunts. |